Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 55W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 +1738%
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy