NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+8828%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
