NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+19148%
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
18
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
