NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
+20380%
7.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB
(215-0862046)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
