NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
+4508%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
