NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA L20
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
11760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
L20
+169471%
59.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
92
16
Shading Units
11776
8
TMUs
368
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
92
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
