NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
+1188%
0.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
3
16
Shading Units
144
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
