NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 31W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
31W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
