NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+35985%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
70
16
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
