NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+106814%
37.42 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
84
16
Shading Units
10752
8
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
