NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+44357%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
22 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
