NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
+6848%
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
