NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+56071%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
