NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
A2
+12845%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
10
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
