NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 31W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+6726%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-200-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
