AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+2343%
64.51 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
5376
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 31
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
