AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+2995%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
1000W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
153 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
