AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+149%
2.64 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GM107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
