Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs Moore Threads MTT S80

AMD FireStream 9370 vs Moore Threads MTT S80

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 255W)
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
MTT S80 +458%
14.75 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
1600
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
255W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TeraScale 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
22 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net