AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+1570%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2024
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
66
1600
Shading Units
8448
80
TMUs
264
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
285W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
