AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (152.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (210W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+101%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1600
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
210W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF110
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
