AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+67%
4.416 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1600
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU116
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
