AMD FireStream 9370 vs ATI FirePro V7900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+42%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2011
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cayman
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
