AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+329%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2011
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cayman
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
