AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+64%
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1600
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GA107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
Unknown
334 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
