AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
4704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+1225%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
1440
Shading Units
6144
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD104
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
