AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D
+4%
2.106 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jul 2017
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
896
72
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
