AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+326%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Fiji
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
