AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon R7 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+31%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.536 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Bonaire
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
