AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG
+509%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2017
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
