Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs Moore Threads MTT S50

AMD FireStream 9350 vs Moore Threads MTT S50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
MTT S50 +143%
4.915 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
1440
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
TeraScale 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
Unknown
334 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net