AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+18%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireStream
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG1
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
Unknown
334 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
