AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 17.02GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+950%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
17.02GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1440
Shading Units
64
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
G94
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
