AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+305%
2.016 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV670
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
