AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV380
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-
