AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FireMV 2260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1400 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+4940%
2.016 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV620
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
