AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1320 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+1300%
2.016 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireStream
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
120
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
73W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
RV630
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
