AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+52%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
