AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
A30 PCIe
+411%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1440
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GA100
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
