AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA TITAN V
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 12GB VRAM TITAN V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN V 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (651.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
TITAN V
+1141%
14.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
651.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
465.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.80 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.90 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.450 TFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GV100
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GV100-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
