AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+900%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD107
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
