Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 560

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 560

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 +117%
2.611 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Polaris 21
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net