AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
+64%
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
115W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX
(215-0839097)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
