Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +525%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
3
800
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV630
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy