AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (134W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+32%
1.585 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
134W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK106
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
