AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (58W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
+733%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G94
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
