AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
+346%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
112
40
TMUs
28
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G80
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
