AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
+20%
1.2 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV770
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
