Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro V5800

AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (74W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +8%
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
74W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Juniper
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net