AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+565%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Capsaicin
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.0
